Title |
Earliest Archaeological Evidence of Persistent Hominin Carnivory
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0062174 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph V. Ferraro, Thomas W. Plummer, Briana L. Pobiner, James S. Oliver, Laura C. Bishop, David R. Braun, Peter W. Ditchfield, John W. Seaman, Katie M. Binetti, John W. Seaman, Fritz Hertel, Richard Potts |
Abstract |
The emergence of lithic technology by ≈ 2.6 million years ago (Ma) is often interpreted as a correlate of increasingly recurrent hominin acquisition and consumption of animal remains. Associated faunal evidence, however, is poorly preserved prior to ≈ 1.8 Ma, limiting our understanding of early archaeological (Oldowan) hominin carnivory. Here, we detail three large well-preserved zooarchaeological assemblages from Kanjera South, Kenya. The assemblages date to 2.0 Ma, pre-dating all previously published archaeofaunas of appreciable size. At Kanjera, there is clear evidence that Oldowan hominins acquired and processed numerous, relatively complete, small ungulate carcasses. Moreover, they had at least occasional access to the fleshed remains of larger, wildebeest-sized animals. The overall record of hominin activities is consistent through the stratified sequence - spanning hundreds to thousands of years - and provides the earliest archaeological evidence of sustained hominin involvement with fleshed animal remains (i.e., persistent carnivory), a foraging adaptation central to many models of hominin evolution. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 22 | 32% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
Australia | 3 | 4% |
Italy | 2 | 3% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Kenya | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 56 | 81% |
Scientists | 9 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 2% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 252 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 45 | 17% |
Researcher | 35 | 13% |
Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
Professor | 17 | 6% |
Other | 47 | 18% |
Unknown | 44 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 45 | 17% |
Arts and Humanities | 41 | 16% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 6% |
Psychology | 11 | 4% |
Other | 44 | 17% |
Unknown | 53 | 20% |