↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Does Taste Matter? How Anticipation of Cola Brands Influences Gustatory Processing in the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
61 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Does Taste Matter? How Anticipation of Cola Brands Influences Gustatory Processing in the Brain
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0061569
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Kühn, Jürgen Gallinat

Abstract

Brands surround us everywhere in daily life. Here we investigate the influences of brand cues on gustatory processing of the same beverage. Participants were led to believe that the brand that announced the administration of a Cola mixture provided correct information about the drink to come. We found stronger fMRI signal in right mOFC during weak compared to strong brand cues in a contrast of parametric modulation with subjective liking. When directly comparing the two strong brands cues, more activation in the right amygdala was found for Coca Cola cues compared with Pepsi Cola cues. During the taste phase the same beverage elicited stronger activation in left ventral striatum when it was previously announced by a strong compared with a weak brand. This effect was stronger in participants who drink Cola infrequently and might therefore point to a stronger reliance on brand cues in less experienced consumers. The present results reveal strong effects of brand labels on neural responses signalling reward.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 96 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Researcher 15 15%
Professor 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 22%
Neuroscience 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 16 16%