↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Are Stripes Beneficial? Dazzle Camouflage Influences Perceived Speed and Hit Rates

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Are Stripes Beneficial? Dazzle Camouflage Influences Perceived Speed and Hit Rates
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0061173
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina von Helversen, Lael J. Schooler, Uwe Czienskowski

Abstract

In the animal kingdom, camouflage refers to patterns that help potential prey avoid detection. Mostly camouflage is thought of as helping prey blend in with their background. In contrast, disruptive or dazzle patterns protect moving targets and have been suggested as an evolutionary force in shaping the dorsal patterns of animals. Dazzle patterns, such as stripes and zigzags, are thought to reduce the probability with which moving prey will be captured by impairing predators' perception of speed. We investigated how different patterns of stripes (longitudinal-i.e., parallel to movement direction-and vertical-i.e., perpendicular to movement direction) affect the probability with which humans can hit moving objects and if differences in hitting probability are caused by a misperception of speed. A first experiment showed that longitudinally striped objects were hit more often than unicolored objects. However, vertically striped objects did not differ from unicolored objects. A second study examining the link between perceived speed and hitting probability showed that longitudinally and vertically striped objects were both perceived as moving faster and were hit more often than unicolored objects. In sum, our results provide evidence that striped patterns disrupt the perception of speed, which in turn influences how often objects are hit. However, the magnitude and the direction of the effects depend on additional factors such as speed and the task setup.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Other 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 40%
Psychology 12 16%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 10 13%