↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Identifying Communities and Key Vertices by Reconstructing Networks from Samples

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Identifying Communities and Key Vertices by Reconstructing Networks from Samples
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0061006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bowen Yan, Steve Gregory

Abstract

Sampling techniques such as Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) are widely used in epidemiology to sample "hidden" populations, such that properties of the network can be deduced from the sample. We consider how similar techniques can be designed that allow the discovery of the structure, especially the community structure, of networks. Our method involves collecting samples of a network by random walks and reconstructing the network by probabilistically coalescing vertices, using vertex attributes to determine the probabilities. Even though our method can only approximately reconstruct a part of the original network, it can recover its community structure relatively well. Moreover, it can find the key vertices which, when immunized, can effectively reduce the spread of an infection through the original network.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Lebanon 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Researcher 4 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 8 31%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%