↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Preserving the Impossible: Conservation of Soft-Sediment Hominin Footprint Sites and Strategies for Three-Dimensional Digital Data Capture

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Preserving the Impossible: Conservation of Soft-Sediment Hominin Footprint Sites and Strategies for Three-Dimensional Digital Data Capture
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060755
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew R. Bennett, Peter Falkingham, Sarita A. Morse, Karl Bates, Robin H. Crompton

Abstract

Human footprints provide some of the most publically emotive and tangible evidence of our ancestors. To the scientific community they provide evidence of stature, presence, behaviour and in the case of early hominins potential evidence with respect to the evolution of gait. While rare in the geological record the number of footprint sites has increased in recent years along with the analytical tools available for their study. Many of these sites are at risk from rapid erosion, including the Ileret footprints in northern Kenya which are second only in age to those at Laetoli (Tanzania). Unlithified, soft-sediment footprint sites such these pose a significant geoconservation challenge. In the first part of this paper conservation and preservation options are explored leading to the conclusion that to 'record and digitally rescue' provides the only viable approach. Key to such strategies is the increasing availability of three-dimensional data capture either via optical laser scanning and/or digital photogrammetry. Within the discipline there is a developing schism between those that favour one approach over the other and a requirement from geoconservationists and the scientific community for some form of objective appraisal of these alternatives is necessary. Consequently in the second part of this paper we evaluate these alternative approaches and the role they can play in a 'record and digitally rescue' conservation strategy. Using modern footprint data, digital models created via optical laser scanning are compared to those generated by state-of-the-art photogrammetry. Both methods give comparable although subtly different results. This data is evaluated alongside a review of field deployment issues to provide guidance to the community with respect to the factors which need to be considered in digital conservation of human/hominin footprints.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Arts and Humanities 5 9%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 11 19%