↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Telling Lies: The Irrepressible Truth?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Telling Lies: The Irrepressible Truth?
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060713
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma J. Williams, Lewis A. Bott, John Patrick, Michael B. Lewis

Abstract

Telling a lie takes longer than telling the truth but precisely why remains uncertain. We investigated two processes suggested to increase response times, namely the decision to lie and the construction of a lie response. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were directed or chose whether to lie or tell the truth. A colored square was presented and participants had to name either the true color of the square or lie about it by claiming it was a different color. In both experiments we found that there was a greater difference between lying and telling the truth when participants were directed to lie compared to when they chose to lie. In Experiments 3 and 4, we compared response times when participants had only one possible lie option to a choice of two or three possible options. There was a greater lying latency effect when questions involved more than one possible lie response. Experiment 5 examined response choice mechanisms through the manipulation of lie plausibility. Overall, results demonstrate several distinct mechanisms that contribute to additional processing requirements when individuals tell a lie.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 25%