↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Testing the Validity of Women's Self-Report of Key Maternal and Newborn Health Interventions during the Peripartum Period in Mozambique

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Testing the Validity of Women's Self-Report of Key Maternal and Newborn Health Interventions during the Peripartum Period in Mozambique
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060694
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia K. Stanton, Barbara Rawlins, Mary Drake, Matias dos Anjos, David Cantor, Lidia Chongo, Leonardo Chavane, Maria da Luz Vaz, Jim Ricca

Abstract

As low-income countries strive to meet targets for Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, there is growing need to track coverage and quality of high-impact peripartum interventions. At present, nationally representative household surveys conducted in low-income settings primarily measure contact with the health system, shedding little light on content or quality of care. The objective of this study is to validate the ability of women in Mozambique to report on facility-based care they and their newborns received during labor and one hour postpartum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 30%
Social Sciences 31 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 34 21%