↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

What Does Brain Response to Neutral Faces Tell Us about Major Depression? Evidence from Machine Learning and fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
What Does Brain Response to Neutral Faces Tell Us about Major Depression? Evidence from Machine Learning and fMRI
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leticia Oliveira, Cecile D. Ladouceur, Mary L. Phillips, Michael Brammer, Janaina Mourao-Miranda

Abstract

A considerable number of previous studies have shown abnormalities in the processing of emotional faces in major depression. Fewer studies, however, have focused specifically on abnormal processing of neutral faces despite evidence that depressed patients are slow and less accurate at recognizing neutral expressions in comparison with healthy controls. The current study aimed to investigate whether this misclassification described behaviourally for neutral faces also occurred when classifying patterns of brain activation to neutral faces for these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 156 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Computer Science 15 9%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 49 30%