↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

CMG-Biotools, a Free Workbench for Basic Comparative Microbial Genomics

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
CMG-Biotools, a Free Workbench for Basic Comparative Microbial Genomics
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tammi Vesth, Karin Lagesen, Öncel Acar, David Ussery

Abstract

Today, there are more than a hundred times as many sequenced prokaryotic genomes than were present in the year 2000. The economical sequencing of genomic DNA has facilitated a whole new approach to microbial genomics. The real power of genomics is manifested through comparative genomics that can reveal strain specific characteristics, diversity within species and many other aspects. However, comparative genomics is a field not easily entered into by scientists with few computational skills. The CMG-biotools package is designed for microbiologists with limited knowledge of computational analysis and can be used to perform a number of analyses and comparisons of genomic data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 6 5%
United States 4 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 106 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 24%
Student > Master 27 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 5 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 8 7%