↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Newborn Brain: Automatic Segmentation of Brain Images into 50 Anatomical Regions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Newborn Brain: Automatic Segmentation of Brain Images into 50 Anatomical Regions
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059990
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis S. Gousias, Alexander Hammers, Serena J. Counsell, Latha Srinivasan, Mary A. Rutherford, Rolf A. Heckemann, Jo V. Hajnal, Daniel Rueckert, A. David Edwards

Abstract

We studied methods for the automatic segmentation of neonatal and developing brain images into 50 anatomical regions, utilizing a new set of manually segmented magnetic resonance (MR) images from 5 term-born and 15 preterm infants imaged at term corrected age called ALBERTs. Two methods were compared: individual registrations with label propagation and fusion; and template based registration with propagation of a maximum probability neonatal ALBERT (MPNA). In both cases we evaluated the performance of different neonatal atlases and MPNA, and the approaches were compared with the manual segmentations by means of the Dice overlap coefficient. Dice values, averaged across regions, were 0.81±0.02 using label propagation and fusion for the preterm population, and 0.81±0.02 using the single registration of a MPNA for the term population. Segmentations of 36 further unsegmented target images of developing brains yielded visibly high-quality results. This registration approach allows the rapid construction of automatically labeled age-specific brain atlases for neonates and the developing brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 104 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Neuroscience 14 13%
Computer Science 12 11%
Engineering 11 10%
Psychology 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 24 21%