↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Putting Brain Training to the Test in the Workplace: A Randomized, Blinded, Multisite, Active-Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
64 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Putting Brain Training to the Test in the Workplace: A Randomized, Blinded, Multisite, Active-Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Borness, Judith Proudfoot, John Crawford, Michael Valenzuela

Abstract

Cognitive training (CT) is effective at improving cognitive outcomes in children with and without clinical impairment as well as older individuals. Yet whether CT is of any preventative health benefit to working age adults is controversial. Our objective was therefore to investigate the real-world efficacy of CT in the workplace, involving employees from across the working-age spectrum and addressing many of the design issues that have limited trials to date.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 265 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 16%
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 65 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 81 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 76 28%