↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
Title
I Should but I Won’t: Why Young Children Endorse Norms of Fair Sharing but Do Not Follow Them
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig E. Smith, Peter R. Blake, Paul L. Harris

Abstract

Young children endorse fairness norms related to sharing, but often act in contradiction to those norms when given a chance to share. This phenomenon has rarely been explored in the context of a single study. Using a novel approach, the research presented here offers clear evidence of this discrepancy and goes on to examine possible explanations for its diminution with age. In Study 1, 3-8-year-old children readily stated that they themselves should share equally, asserted that others should as well, and predicted that others had shared equally with them. Nevertheless, children failed to engage in equal sharing until ages 7-8. In Study 2, 7-8-year-olds correctly predicted that they would share equally, and 3-6-year-olds correctly predicted that they would favor themselves, ruling out a failure-of-willpower explanation for younger children's behavior. Similarly, a test of inhibitory control in Study 1 also failed to explain the shift with age toward adherence to the endorsed norm. The data suggest that, although 3-year-olds know the norm of equal sharing, the weight that children attach to this norm increases with age when sharing involves a cost to the self.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 318 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Student > Bachelor 59 18%
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Researcher 24 7%
Other 65 20%
Unknown 49 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 184 56%
Social Sciences 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 61 19%