↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Here Today, Gone Tomorrow – Adaptation to Change in Memory-Guided Visual Search

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Here Today, Gone Tomorrow – Adaptation to Change in Memory-Guided Visual Search
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Zellin, Markus Conci, Adrian von Mühlenen, Hermann J. Müller

Abstract

Visual search for a target object can be facilitated by the repeated presentation of an invariant configuration of nontargets ('contextual cueing'). Here, we tested adaptation of learned contextual associations after a sudden, but permanent, relocation of the target. After an initial learning phase targets were relocated within their invariant contexts and repeatedly presented at new locations, before they returned to the initial locations. Contextual cueing for relocated targets was neither observed after numerous presentations nor after insertion of an overnight break. Further experiments investigated whether learning of additional, previously unseen context-target configurations is comparable to adaptation of existing contextual associations to change. In contrast to the lack of adaptation to changed target locations, contextual cueing developed for additional invariant configurations under identical training conditions. Moreover, across all experiments, presenting relocated targets or additional contexts did not interfere with contextual cueing of initially learned invariant configurations. Overall, the adaptation of contextual memory to changed target locations was severely constrained and unsuccessful in comparison to learning of an additional set of contexts, which suggests that contextual cueing facilitates search for only one repeated target location.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
United States 2 4%
Germany 2 4%
Unknown 46 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 62%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 19%