↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Network Class Superposition Analyses

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Network Class Superposition Analyses
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl A. B. Pearson, Chen Zeng, Rahul Simha

Abstract

Networks are often used to understand a whole system by modeling the interactions among its pieces. Examples include biomolecules in a cell interacting to provide some primary function, or species in an environment forming a stable community. However, these interactions are often unknown; instead, the pieces' dynamic states are known, and network structure must be inferred. Because observed function may be explained by many different networks (e.g., ≈ 10(30) for the yeast cell cycle process), considering dynamics beyond this primary function means picking a single network or suitable sample: measuring over all networks exhibiting the primary function is computationally infeasible. We circumvent that obstacle by calculating the network class ensemble. We represent the ensemble by a stochastic matrix T, which is a transition-by-transition superposition of the system dynamics for each member of the class. We present concrete results for T derived from boolean time series dynamics on networks obeying the Strong Inhibition rule, by applying T to several traditional questions about network dynamics. We show that the distribution of the number of point attractors can be accurately estimated with T. We show how to generate Derrida plots based on T. We show that T-based Shannon entropy outperforms other methods at selecting experiments to further narrow the network structure. We also outline an experimental test of predictions based on T. We motivate all of these results in terms of a popular molecular biology boolean network model for the yeast cell cycle, but the methods and analyses we introduce are general. We conclude with open questions for T, for example, application to other models, computational considerations when scaling up to larger systems, and other potential analyses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Professor 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Physics and Astronomy 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%