↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Constructing a Stochastic Model of Bumblebee Flights from Experimental Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Constructing a Stochastic Model of Bumblebee Flights from Experimental Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Friedrich Lenz, Aleksei V. Chechkin, Rainer Klages

Abstract

The movement of organisms is subject to a multitude of influences of widely varying character: from the bio-mechanics of the individual, over the interaction with the complex environment many animals live in, to evolutionary pressure and energy constraints. As the number of factors is large, it is very hard to build comprehensive movement models. Even when movement patterns in simple environments are analysed, the organisms can display very complex behaviours. While for largely undirected motion or long observation times the dynamics can sometimes be described by isotropic random walks, usually the directional persistence due to a preference to move forward has to be accounted for, e.g., by a correlated random walk. In this paper we generalise these descriptions to a model in terms of stochastic differential equations of Langevin type, which we use to analyse experimental search flight data of foraging bumblebees. Using parameter estimates we discuss the differences and similarities to correlated random walks. From simulations we generate artificial bumblebee trajectories which we use as a validation by comparing the generated ones to the experimental data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 38%
Researcher 9 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Physics and Astronomy 10 24%
Environmental Science 7 17%
Mathematics 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 12%