↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Pareto-Optimal Refinement Method for Protein Design Scaffolds

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Pareto-Optimal Refinement Method for Protein Design Scaffolds
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas Gregorio Nivón, Rocco Moretti, David Baker

Abstract

Computational design of protein function involves a search for amino acids with the lowest energy subject to a set of constraints specifying function. In many cases a set of natural protein backbone structures, or "scaffolds", are searched to find regions where functional sites (an enzyme active site, ligand binding pocket, protein-protein interaction region, etc.) can be placed, and the identities of the surrounding amino acids are optimized to satisfy functional constraints. Input native protein structures almost invariably have regions that score very poorly with the design force field, and any design based on these unmodified structures may result in mutations away from the native sequence solely as a result of the energetic strain. Because the input structure is already a stable protein, it is desirable to keep the total number of mutations to a minimum and to avoid mutations resulting from poorly-scoring input structures. Here we describe a protocol using cycles of minimization with combined backbone/sidechain restraints that is Pareto-optimal with respect to RMSD to the native structure and energetic strain reduction. The protocol should be broadly useful in the preparation of scaffold libraries for functional site design.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 27%
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 18%
Chemistry 27 13%
Computer Science 9 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 44 22%