↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Incorporating DNA Sequencing into Current Prenatal Screening Practice for Down's Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Incorporating DNA Sequencing into Current Prenatal Screening Practice for Down's Syndrome
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058732
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J. Wald, Jonathan P. Bestwick

Abstract

Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome is performed using biochemical and ultrasound markers measured in early pregnancy such as the Integrated test using first and second trimester markers. Recently, DNA sequencing methods have been introduced on free DNA in maternal plasma, yielding a high screening performance. These methods are expensive and there is a test failure rate. We determined the screening performance of merging the Integrated test with the newer DNA techniques in a protocol that substantially reduces the cost compared with universal DNA testing and still achieves high screening performance with no test failures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Other 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 5 10%