↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Comparison and Relative Utility of Inequality Measurements: As Applied to Scotland’s Child Dental Health

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Comparison and Relative Utility of Inequality Measurements: As Applied to Scotland’s Child Dental Health
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058593
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne I. Blair, Alex D. McMahon, Lorna M. D. Macpherson

Abstract

This study compared and assessed the utility of tests of inequality on a series of very large population caries datasets. National cross-sectional caries datasets for Scotland's 5-year-olds in 1993/94 (n = 5,078); 1995/96 (n = 6,240); 1997/98 (n = 6,584); 1999/00 (n = 6,781); 2002/03 (n = 9,747); 2003/04 (n = 10,956); 2005/06 (n = 10,945) and 2007/08 (n = 12,067) were obtained. Outcomes were based on the d3mft metric (i.e. the number of decayed, missing and filled teeth). An area-based deprivation category (DepCat) measured the subjects' socioeconomic status (SES). Simple absolute and relative inequality, Odds Ratios and the Significant Caries Index (SIC) as advocated by the World Health Organization were calculated. The measures of complex inequality applied to data were: the Slope Index of Inequality (absolute) and a variety of relative inequality tests i.e. Gini coefficient; Relative Index of Inequality; concentration curve; Koolman & Doorslaer's transformed Concentration Index; Receiver Operator Curve and Population Attributable Risk (PAR). Additional tests used were plots of SIC deciles (SIC(10)) and a Scottish Caries Inequality Metric (SCIM(10)). Over the period, mean d3mft improved from 3.1(95%CI 3.0-3.2) to 1.9(95%CI 1.8-1.9) and d3mft = 0% from 41.1(95%CI 39.8-42.3) to 58.3(95%CI 57.8-59.7). Absolute simple and complex inequality decreased. Relative simple and complex inequality remained comparatively stable. Our results support the use of the SII and RII to measure complex absolute and relative SES inequalities alongside additional tests of complex relative inequality such as PAR and Koolman and Doorslaer's transformed CI. The latter two have clear interpretations which may influence policy makers. Specialised dental metrics (i.e. SIC, SIC(10) and SCIM(10)) permit the exploration of other important inequalities not determined by SES, and could be applied to many other types of disease where ranking of morbidity is possible e.g. obesity. More generally, the approaches described may be applied to study patterns of health inequality affecting worldwide populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 48%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 17%