↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Validation of eDNA Surveillance Sensitivity for Detection of Asian Carps in Controlled and Field Experiments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
Title
Validation of eDNA Surveillance Sensitivity for Detection of Asian Carps in Controlled and Field Experiments
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew R. Mahon, Christopher L. Jerde, Matthew Galaska, Jennifer L. Bergner, W. Lindsay Chadderton, David M. Lodge, Margaret E. Hunter, Leo G. Nico

Abstract

In many North American rivers, populations of multiple species of non-native cyprinid fishes are present, including black carp (Mylpharyngodon piceus), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), common carp (Cyprinus carpio), and goldfish (Carassius auratus). All six of these species are found in the Mississippi River basin and tracking their invasion has proven difficult, particularly where abundance is low. Knowledge of the location of the invasion front is valuable to natural resource managers because future ecological and economic damages can be most effectively prevented when populations are low. To test the accuracy of environmental DNA (eDNA) as an early indicator of species occurrence and relative abundance, we applied eDNA technology to the six non-native cyprinid species putatively present in a 2.6 river mile stretch of the Chicago (IL, USA) canal system that was subsequently treated with piscicide. The proportion of water samples yielding positive detections increased with relative abundance of the six species, as indicated by the number of carcasses recovered after poisoning. New markers for black carp, grass carp, and a common carp/goldfish are reported and details of the marker testing to ensure specificity are provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 362 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 21%
Researcher 77 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Other 18 5%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 51 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 49%
Environmental Science 68 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 11%
Engineering 7 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 56 15%