↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Sweet Puppies and Cute Babies: Perceptual Adaptation to Babyfacedness Transfers across Species

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Sweet Puppies and Cute Babies: Perceptual Adaptation to Babyfacedness Transfers across Species
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessika Golle, Stephanie Lisibach, Fred W. Mast, Janek S. Lobmaier

Abstract

Infant faces are very salient stimuli. The Kindchenschema describes specific features that characterize a cute infant face. In this study we used a visual adaptation paradigm to investigate the universality of the perceptual properties of the Kindchenschema. In Experiment 1, twenty-four participants adapted to cute and less cute human infant faces and in Experiment 2, twenty-four new participants adapted to cute and less cute faces of puppy dogs. In both experiments the task was to assess the cuteness of subsequently presented human infant faces. The results revealed cuteness after-effects for human infant faces in both adaptation conditions, suggesting a common mechanism coding cuteness in human and non-human faces. This study provides experimental evidence for the universality of the well-described concept of the Kindchenschema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 28 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 5%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 30 28%