↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
290 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sex Differences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement Are Inversely Related: Within- and Across-Nation Assessment of 10 Years of PISA Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gijsbert Stoet, David C. Geary

Abstract

We analyzed one decade of data collected by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), including the mathematics and reading performance of nearly 1.5 million 15 year olds in 75 countries. Across nations, boys scored higher than girls in mathematics, but lower than girls in reading. The sex difference in reading was three times as large as in mathematics. There was considerable variation in the extent of the sex differences between nations. There are countries without a sex difference in mathematics performance, and in some countries girls scored higher than boys. Boys scored lower in reading in all nations in all four PISA assessments (2000, 2003, 2006, 2009). Contrary to several previous studies, we found no evidence that the sex differences were related to nations' gender equality indicators. Further, paradoxically, sex differences in mathematics were consistently and strongly inversely correlated with sex differences in reading: Countries with a smaller sex difference in mathematics had a larger sex difference in reading and vice versa. We demonstrate that this was not merely a between-nation, but also a within-nation effect. This effect is related to relative changes in these sex differences across the performance continuum: We did not find a sex difference in mathematics among the lowest performing students, but this is where the sex difference in reading was largest. In contrast, the sex difference in mathematics was largest among the higher performing students, and this is where the sex difference in reading was smallest. The implication is that if policy makers decide that changes in these sex differences are desired, different approaches will be needed to achieve this for reading and mathematics. Interventions that focus on high-achieving girls in mathematics and on low achieving boys in reading are likely to yield the strongest educational benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 205 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 327 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 19%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 67 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 26%
Social Sciences 67 20%
Mathematics 17 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 82 24%