↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Visual Function and Cortical Organization in Carriers of Blue Cone Monochromacy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Visual Function and Cortical Organization in Carriers of Blue Cone Monochromacy
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057956
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ethan A. Rossi, Rebecca L. Achtman, Arnaud Guidon, David R. Williams, Austin Roorda, Daphne Bavelier, Joseph Carroll

Abstract

Carriers of blue cone monochromacy have fewer cone photoreceptors than normal. Here we examine how this disruption at the level of the retina affects visual function and cortical organization in these individuals. Visual resolution and contrast sensitivity was measured at the preferred retinal locus of fixation and visual resolution was tested at two eccentric locations (2.5° and 8°) with spectacle correction only. Adaptive optics corrected resolution acuity and cone spacing were simultaneously measured at several locations within the central fovea with adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). Fixation stability was assessed by extracting eye motion data from AOSLO videos. Retinotopic mapping using fMRI was carried out to estimate the area of early cortical regions, including that of the foveal confluence. Without adaptive optics correction, BCM carriers appeared to have normal visual function, with normal contrast sensitivity and visual resolution, but with AO-correction, visual resolution was significantly worse than normal. This resolution deficit is not explained by cone loss alone and is suggestive of an associated loss of retinal ganglion cells. However, despite evidence suggesting a reduction in the number of retinal ganglion cells, retinotopic mapping showed no reduction in the cortical area of the foveal confluence. These results suggest that ganglion cell density may not govern the foveal overrepresentation in the cortex. We propose that it is not the number of afferents, but rather the content of the information relayed to the cortex from the retina across the visual field that governs cortical magnification, as under normal viewing conditions this information is similar in both BCM carriers and normal controls.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Mexico 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Neuroscience 8 15%
Psychology 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 25%