↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Migratory New World Blackbirds (Icterids) Are More Neophobic than Closely Related Resident Icterids

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Migratory New World Blackbirds (Icterids) Are More Neophobic than Closely Related Resident Icterids
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Mettke-Hofmann, Hans Winkler, Paul B. Hamel, Russell Greenberg

Abstract

Environments undergo short-term and long-term changes due to natural or human-induced events. Animals differ in their ability to cope with such changes which can be related to their ecology. Changes in the environment often elicit avoidance reactions (neophobia) which protect animals from dangerous situations but can also inhibit exploration and familiarization with novel situations and thus, learning about new resources. Studies investigating the relationship between a species' ecology and its neophobia have so far been restricted to comparing only a few species and mainly in captivity. The current study investigated neophobia reactions to experimentally-induced changes in the natural environment of six closely-related blackbird species (Icteridae), including two species represented by two distinct populations. For analyses, neophobic reactions (difference in number of birds feeding and time spent feeding with and without novel objects) were related to several measures of ecological plasticity and the migratory strategy (resident or migratory) of the population. Phylogenetic relationships were incorporated into the analysis. The degree of neophobia was related to migratory strategy with migrants expressing much higher neophobia (fewer birds feeding and for a shorter time with objects present) than residents. Furthermore, neophobia showed a relationship to diet breadth with fewer individuals of diet generalists than specialists returning when objects were present supporting the dangerous niche hypothesis. Residents may have evolved lower neophobia as costs of missing out on opportunities may be higher for residents than migrants as the former are restricted to a smaller area. Lower neophobia allows them approaching changes in the environment (e.g. novel objects) quickly, thereby securing access to resources. Additionally, residents have a greater familiarity with similar situations in the area than migrants and the latter may, therefore, initially stay behind resident species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 50%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Psychology 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 21%