↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reducing Neonatal Mortality in India: Critical Role of Access to Emergency Obstetric Care

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Reducing Neonatal Mortality in India: Critical Role of Access to Emergency Obstetric Care
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anu Rammohan, Kazi Iqbal, Niyi Awofeso

Abstract

Neonatal mortality currently accounts for 41% of all global deaths among children below five years. Despite recording a 33% decline in neonatal deaths between 2000 and 2009, about 900,000 neonates died in India in 2009. The decline in neonatal mortality is slower than in the post-neonatal period, and neonatal mortality rates have increased as a proportion of under-five mortality rates. Neonatal mortality rates are higher among rural dwellers of India, who make up at least two-thirds of India's population. Identifying the factors influencing neonatal mortality will significantly improve child survival outcomes in India.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 20%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 33%
Social Sciences 27 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 35 23%