↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Novel Selection Marker for Efficient DNA Cloning and Recombineering in E. coli

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Novel Selection Marker for Efficient DNA Cloning and Recombineering in E. coli
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuan-Wei Jang, Terry Magnuson

Abstract

Production of recombinant DNA in bacterial cells is an essential technique in molecular biology. Plasmids are usually maintained in an E. coli host by antibiotic selection. However, there are only a few antibiotic-resistance markers available in common use. Here we report the adoption of a novel selection marker, mfabI (mutant fabI) for plasmid propagation in E. coli. mfabI expands the limited repertoire of selection markers and allows for more efficient molecular manipulation and plasmid propagation in E. coli. We show that mfabI is not only an efficient plasmid selection marker, but it also possesses unique activity that may facilitate molecular manipulation of unstable sequences. Furthermore, we have incorporated mfabI in the recombineering tool kit for generating mouse gene targeting vectors and demonstrate the advantage of using mfabI-containing recombineering vectors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 26%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 6 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 23%
Engineering 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Chemistry 7 5%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 35 25%