↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Edge Principal Components and Squash Clustering: Using the Special Structure of Phylogenetic Placement Data for Sample Comparison

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Edge Principal Components and Squash Clustering: Using the Special Structure of Phylogenetic Placement Data for Sample Comparison
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederick A. Matsen, Steven N. Evans

Abstract

Principal components analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering are two of the most heavily used techniques for analyzing the differences between nucleic acid sequence samples taken from a given environment. They have led to many insights regarding the structure of microbial communities. We have developed two new complementary methods that leverage how this microbial community data sits on a phylogenetic tree. Edge principal components analysis enables the detection of important differences between samples that contain closely related taxa. Each principal component axis is a collection of signed weights on the edges of the phylogenetic tree, and these weights are easily visualized by a suitable thickening and coloring of the edges. Squash clustering outputs a (rooted) clustering tree in which each internal node corresponds to an appropriate "average" of the original samples at the leaves below the node. Moreover, the length of an edge is a suitably defined distance between the averaged samples associated with the two incident nodes, rather than the less interpretable average of distances produced by UPGMA, the most widely used hierarchical clustering method in this context. We present these methods and illustrate their use with data from the human microbiome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 10%
Sweden 4 2%
Canada 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Estonia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 170 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 33%
Researcher 61 29%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Professor 10 5%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 15 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 9%
Environmental Science 15 7%
Computer Science 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 18 9%