↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Acceptability of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: A Qualitative Study of Patient’s Experiences Nested within a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
The Acceptability of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: A Qualitative Study of Patient’s Experiences Nested within a Randomised Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056806
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann Hopton, Kate Thomas, Hugh MacPherson

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines recommend acupuncture as a clinically effective treatment for chronic back pain. However, there is insufficient knowledge of what factors contribute to patients' positive and negative experiences of acupuncture, and how those factors interact in terms of the acceptability of treatment. This study used patient interviews following acupuncture treatment for back pain to identify, understand and describe the elements that contribute or detract from acceptability of treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 20%
Student > Bachelor 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Psychology 23 13%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 37 21%