↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Centre Selection for Clinical Trials and the Generalisability of Results: A Mixed Methods Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Centre Selection for Clinical Trials and the Generalisability of Results: A Mixed Methods Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056560
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Gheorghe, Tracy E. Roberts, Jonathan C. Ives, Benjamin R. Fletcher, Melanie Calvert

Abstract

The rationale for centre selection in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often unclear but may have important implications for the generalisability of trial results. The aims of this study were to evaluate the factors which currently influence centre selection in RCTs and consider how generalisability considerations inform current and optimal practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 31%