↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Rapid Inverse Planning for Pressure-Driven Drug Infusions in the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Rapid Inverse Planning for Pressure-Driven Drug Infusions in the Brain
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn H. Rosenbluth, Alastair J. Martin, Stephan Mittermeyer, Jan Eschermann, Peter J. Dickinson, Krystof S. Bankiewicz

Abstract

Infusing drugs directly into the brain is advantageous to oral or intravenous delivery for large molecules or drugs requiring high local concentrations with low off-target exposure. However, surgeons manually planning the cannula position for drug delivery in the brain face a challenging three-dimensional visualization task. This study presents an intuitive inverse-planning technique to identify the optimal placement that maximizes coverage of the target structure while minimizing the potential for leakage outside the target. The technique was retrospectively validated using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging of infusions into the striatum of non-human primates and into a tumor in a canine model and applied prospectively to upcoming human clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 10%
Unknown 27 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Engineering 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%