↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Functional Redundancy and Complementarities of Seed Dispersal by the Last Neotropical Megafrugivores

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
Title
Functional Redundancy and Complementarities of Seed Dispersal by the Last Neotropical Megafrugivores
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael S. Bueno, Roger Guevara, Milton C. Ribeiro, Laurence Culot, Felipe S. Bufalo, Mauro Galetti

Abstract

Functional redundancy has been debated largely in ecology and conservation, yet we lack detailed empirical studies on the roles of functionally similar species in ecosystem function. Large bodied frugivores may disperse similar plant species and have strong impact on plant recruitment in tropical forests. The two largest frugivores in the neotropics, tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) and muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides) are potential candidates for functional redundancy on seed dispersal effectiveness. Here we provide a comparison of the quantitative, qualitative and spatial effects on seed dispersal by these megafrugivores in a continuous Brazilian Atlantic forest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 26 5%
Argentina 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 456 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 15%
Student > Bachelor 71 14%
Researcher 63 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 10%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 76 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 263 53%
Environmental Science 100 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Engineering 6 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 100 20%