↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
114 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franziska Kretzschmar, Dominique Pleimling, Jana Hosemann, Stephan Füssel, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Matthias Schlesewsky

Abstract

In the rapidly changing circumstances of our increasingly digital world, reading is also becoming an increasingly digital experience: electronic books (e-books) are now outselling print books in the United States and the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, many readers still view e-books as less readable than print books. The present study thus used combined EEG and eyetracking measures in order to test whether reading from digital media requires higher cognitive effort than reading conventional books. Young and elderly adults read short texts on three different reading devices: a paper page, an e-reader and a tablet computer and answered comprehension questions about them while their eye movements and EEG were recorded. The results of a debriefing questionnaire replicated previous findings in that participants overwhelmingly chose the paper page over the two electronic devices as their preferred reading medium. Online measures, by contrast, showed shorter mean fixation durations and lower EEG theta band voltage density--known to covary with memory encoding and retrieval--for the older adults when reading from a tablet computer in comparison to the other two devices. Young adults showed comparable fixation durations and theta activity for all three devices. Comprehension accuracy did not differ across the three media for either group. We argue that these results can be explained in terms of the better text discriminability (higher contrast) produced by the backlit display of the tablet computer. Contrast sensitivity decreases with age and degraded contrast conditions lead to longer reading times, thus supporting the conclusion that older readers may benefit particularly from the enhanced contrast of the tablet. Our findings thus indicate that people's subjective evaluation of digital reading media must be dissociated from the cognitive and neural effort expended in online information processing while reading from such devices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 7 2%
Germany 5 2%
United States 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Croatia 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 257 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 15%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Other 20 7%
Other 62 22%
Unknown 51 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 18%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Linguistics 26 9%
Arts and Humanities 20 7%
Computer Science 19 7%
Other 79 28%
Unknown 63 22%