↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Methodologic Differences Affect Results of Economic Analyses: A Systematic Review of Interferon Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of LTBI

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
How Methodologic Differences Affect Results of Economic Analyses: A Systematic Review of Interferon Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of LTBI
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0056044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivia Oxlade, Marcia Pinto, Anete Trajman, Dick Menzies

Abstract

Cost effectiveness analyses (CEA) can provide useful information on how to invest limited funds, however they are less useful if different analysis of the same intervention provide unclear or contradictory results. The objective of our study was to conduct a systematic review of methodologic aspects of CEA that evaluate Interferon Gamma Release Assays (IGRA) for the detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI), in order to understand how differences affect study results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 27%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 24 24%