↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Prey Pathway: A Regional History of Cattle (Bos taurus) and Pig (Sus scrofa) Domestication in the Northern Jordan Valley, Israel

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
The Prey Pathway: A Regional History of Cattle (Bos taurus) and Pig (Sus scrofa) Domestication in the Northern Jordan Valley, Israel
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055958
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nimrod Marom, Guy Bar-Oz

Abstract

The faunal assemblage from the 9(th)-8(th) millennium BP site at Sha'ar Hagolan, Israel, is used to study human interaction with wild suids and cattle in a time period just before the appearance of domesticated animals of these species in the Jordan Valley. Our results, based on demographic and osteometric data, indicate that full domestication of both cattle and suids occurred at the site during the 8(th) millennium. Importantly, domestication was preceded in both taxa by demographic and metric population parameters indicating severe overhunting. The possible role of overhunting in shaping the characteristics of domesticated animals and the social infrastructure to ownership of herds is then explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 25%
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 18 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Social Sciences 10 14%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 24%