↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Structural and Functional Imaging Studies in Chronic Cannabis Users: A Systematic Review of Adolescent and Adult Findings

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
321 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
557 Mendeley
Title
Structural and Functional Imaging Studies in Chronic Cannabis Users: A Systematic Review of Adolescent and Adult Findings
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert Batalla, Sagnik Bhattacharyya, Murat Yücel, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Jose Alexandre Crippa, Santiago Nogué, Marta Torrens, Jesús Pujol, Magí Farré, Rocio Martin-Santos

Abstract

The growing concern about cannabis use, the most commonly used illicit drug worldwide, has led to a significant increase in the number of human studies using neuroimaging techniques to determine the effect of cannabis on brain structure and function. We conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence of the impact of chronic cannabis use on brain structure and function in adults and adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 536 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 81 15%
Researcher 80 14%
Student > Master 68 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 8%
Other 123 22%
Unknown 97 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 126 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 107 19%
Neuroscience 71 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 8%
Social Sciences 20 4%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 121 22%