↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Mining Skeletal Phenotype Descriptions from Scientific Literature

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Mining Skeletal Phenotype Descriptions from Scientific Literature
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tudor Groza, Jane Hunter, Andreas Zankl

Abstract

Phenotype descriptions are important for our understanding of genetics, as they enable the computation and analysis of a varied range of issues related to the genetic and developmental bases of correlated characters. The literature contains a wealth of such phenotype descriptions, usually reported as free-text entries, similar to typical clinical summaries. In this paper, we focus on creating and making available an annotated corpus of skeletal phenotype descriptions. In addition, we present and evaluate a hybrid Machine Learning approach for mining phenotype descriptions from free text. Our hybrid approach uses an ensemble of four classifiers and experiments with several aggregation techniques. The best scoring technique achieves an F-1 score of 71.52%, which is close to the state-of-the-art in other domains, where training data exists in abundance. Finally, we discuss the influence of the features chosen for the model on the overall performance of the method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Computer Science 5 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 25%