↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Brain Training Game Boosts Executive Functions, Working Memory and Processing Speed in the Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
573 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Brain Training Game Boosts Executive Functions, Working Memory and Processing Speed in the Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055518
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Nouchi, Yasuyuki Taki, Hikaru Takeuchi, Hiroshi Hashizume, Takayuki Nozawa, Toshimune Kambara, Atsushi Sekiguchi, Carlos Makoto Miyauchi, Yuka Kotozaki, Haruka Nouchi, Ryuta Kawashima

Abstract

Do brain training games work? The beneficial effects of brain training games are expected to transfer to other cognitive functions. Yet in all honesty, beneficial transfer effects of the commercial brain training games in young adults have little scientific basis. Here we investigated the impact of the brain training game (Brain Age) on a wide range of cognitive functions in young adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 573 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 554 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 109 19%
Student > Master 88 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 15%
Researcher 65 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 5%
Other 108 19%
Unknown 88 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 201 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 9%
Neuroscience 47 8%
Computer Science 38 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 4%
Other 106 18%
Unknown 110 19%