↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Impact of Media Reporting on the Emergence of Charcoal Burning Suicide in Taiwan

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Impact of Media Reporting on the Emergence of Charcoal Burning Suicide in Taiwan
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0055000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying-Yeh Chen, Feng Chen, David Gunnell, Paul S. F. Yip

Abstract

We investigated the association of the intensity of newspaper reporting of charcoal burning suicide with the incidence of such deaths in Taiwan during 1998-2002. A counting process approach was used to estimate the incidence of suicides and intensity of news reporting. Conditional Poisson generalized linear autoregressive models were performed to assess the association of the intensity of newspaper reporting of charcoal burning and non-charcoal burning suicides with the actual number of charcoal burning and non-charcoal burning suicides the following day. We found that increases in the reporting of charcoal burning suicide were associated with increases in the incidence of charcoal burning suicide on the following day, with each reported charcoal burning news item being associated with a 16% increase in next day charcoal burning suicide (p<.0001). However, the reporting of other methods of suicide was not related to their incidence. We conclude that extensive media reporting of charcoal burning suicides appears to have contributed to the rapid rise in the incidence of the novel method in Taiwan during the initial stage of the suicide epidemic. Regulating media reporting of novel suicide methods may prevent an epidemic spread of such new methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Social Sciences 9 26%
Mathematics 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%