↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Important Is ‘Accuracy’ of Surrogate Decision-Making for Research Participation?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
How Important Is ‘Accuracy’ of Surrogate Decision-Making for Research Participation?
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Y. H. Kim, H. Myra Kim, Kerry A. Ryan, Paul S. Appelbaum, David S. Knopman, Laura Damschroder, Raymond De Vries

Abstract

There is a longstanding concern about the accuracy of surrogate consent in representing the health care and research preferences of those who lose their ability to decide for themselves. We sought informed, deliberative views of the older general public (≥50 years old) regarding their willingness to participate in dementia research and to grant leeway to future surrogates to choose an option contrary to their stated wishes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Psychology 8 11%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 27%