↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Size-Related Changes in Foot Impact Mechanics in Hoofed Mammals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Size-Related Changes in Foot Impact Mechanics in Hoofed Mammals
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Elaine Warner, Phillip Pickering, Olga Panagiotopoulou, Thilo Pfau, Lei Ren, John Richard Hutchinson

Abstract

Foot-ground impact is mechanically challenging for all animals, but how do large animals mitigate increased mass during foot impact? We hypothesized that impact force amplitude scales according to isometry in animals of increasing size through allometric scaling of related impact parameters. To test this, we measured limb kinetics and kinematics in 11 species of hoofed mammals ranging from 18-3157 kg body mass. We found impact force amplitude to be maintained proportional to size in hoofed mammals, but that other features of foot impact exhibit differential scaling patterns depending on the limb; forelimb parameters typically exhibit higher intercepts with lower scaling exponents than hind limb parameters. Our explorations of the size-related consequences of foot impact advance understanding of how body size influences limb morphology and function, foot design and locomotor behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 34%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 23%