↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Olive Tree-Ring Problematic Dating: A Comparative Analysis on Santorini (Greece)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Olive Tree-Ring Problematic Dating: A Comparative Analysis on Santorini (Greece)
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054730
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Cherubini, Turi Humbel, Hans Beeckman, Holger Gärtner, David Mannes, Charlotte Pearson, Werner Schoch, Roberto Tognetti, Simcha Lev-Yadun

Abstract

Olive trees are a classic component of Mediterranean environments and some of them are known historically to be very old. In order to evaluate the possibility to use olive tree-rings for dendrochronology, we examined by various methods the reliability of olive tree-rings identification. Dendrochronological analyses of olive trees growing on the Aegean island Santorini (Greece) show that the determination of the number of tree-rings is impossible because of intra-annual wood density fluctuations, variability in tree-ring boundary structure, and restriction of its cambial activity to shifting sectors of the circumference, causing the tree-ring sequences along radii of the same cross section to differ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Professor 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 34%
Environmental Science 14 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 9%
Arts and Humanities 7 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 15 17%