Title |
Transient B-Cell Depletion with Anti-CD20 in Combination with Proinsulin DNA Vaccine or Oral Insulin: Immunologic Effects and Efficacy in NOD Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0054712 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ghanashyam Sarikonda, Sowbarnika Sachithanantham, Yulia Manenkova, Tinalyn Kupfer, Amanda Posgai, Clive Wasserfall, Philip Bernstein, Laura Straub, Philippe P. Pagni, Darius Schneider, Teresa Rodriguez Calvo, Marilyne Coulombe, Kevan Herold, Ronald G. Gill, Mark Atkinson, Gerald Nepom, Mario Ehlers, Teodora Staeva, Hideki Garren, Lawrence Steinman, Andrew C. Chan, Matthias von Herrath |
Abstract |
A recent type 1 diabetes (T1D) clinical trial of rituximab (a B cell-depleting anti-CD20 antibody) achieved some therapeutic benefit in preserving C-peptide for a period of approximately nine months in patients with recently diagnosed diabetes. Our previous data in the NOD mouse demonstrated that co-administration of antigen (insulin) with anti-CD3 antibody (a T cell-directed immunomodulator) offers better protection than either entity alone, indicating that novel combination therapies that include a T1D-related autoantigen are possible. To accelerate the identification and development of novel combination therapies that can be advanced into the clinic, we have evaluated the combination of a mouse anti-CD20 antibody with either oral insulin or a proinsulin-expressing DNA vaccine. Anti-CD20 alone, given once or on 4 consecutive days, produced transient B cell depletion but did not prevent or reverse T1D in the NOD mouse. Oral insulin alone (twice weekly for 6 weeks) was also ineffective, while proinsulin DNA (weekly for up to 12 weeks) showed a trend toward modest efficacy. Combination of anti-CD20 with oral insulin was ineffective in reversing diabetes in NOD mice whose glycemia was controlled with SC insulin pellets; these experiments were performed in three independent labs. Combination of anti-CD20 with proinsulin DNA was also ineffective in diabetes reversal, but did show modest efficacy in diabetes prevention (p = 0.04). In the prevention studies, anti-CD20 plus proinsulin resulted in modest increases in Tregs in pancreatic lymph nodes and elevated levels of proinsulin-specific CD4+ T-cells that produced IL-4. Thus, combination therapy with anti-CD20 and either oral insulin or proinsulin does not protect hyperglycemic NOD mice, but the combination with proinsulin offers limited efficacy in T1D prevention, potentially by augmentation of proinsulin-specific IL-4 production. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 21% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |