↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Lexical Processing in Deaf Readers: An fMRI Investigation of Reading Proficiency

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Lexical Processing in Deaf Readers: An fMRI Investigation of Reading Proficiency
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054696
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Corina, Laurel A. Lawyer, Peter Hauser, Elizabeth Hirshorn

Abstract

Individuals with significant hearing loss often fail to attain competency in reading orthographic scripts which encode the sound properties of spoken language. Nevertheless, some profoundly deaf individuals do learn to read at age-appropriate levels. The question of what differentiates proficient deaf readers from less-proficient readers is poorly understood but topical, as efforts to develop appropriate and effective interventions are needed. This study uses functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activation in deaf readers (N = 21), comparing proficient (N = 11) and less proficient (N = 10) readers' performance in a widely used test of implicit reading. Proficient deaf readers activated left inferior frontal gyrus and left middle and superior temporal gyrus in a pattern that is consistent with regions reported in hearing readers. In contrast, the less-proficient readers exhibited a pattern of response characterized by inferior and middle frontal lobe activation (right>left) which bears some similarity to areas reported in studies of logographic reading, raising the possibility that these individuals are using a qualitatively different mode of orthographic processing than is traditionally observed in hearing individuals reading sound-based scripts. The evaluation of proficient and less-proficient readers points to different modes of processing printed English words. Importantly, these preliminary findings allow us to begin to establish the impact of linguistic and educational factors on the neural systems that underlie reading achievement in profoundly deaf individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
Portugal 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 83 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Professor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 27%
Neuroscience 13 14%
Linguistics 9 10%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 20 22%