↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Adolescents’ Functional Numeracy Is Predicted by Their School Entry Number System Knowledge

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
74 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Adolescents’ Functional Numeracy Is Predicted by Their School Entry Number System Knowledge
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054651
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C. Geary, Mary K. Hoard, Lara Nugent, Drew H. Bailey

Abstract

One in five adults in the United States is functionally innumerate; they do not possess the mathematical competencies needed for many modern jobs. We administered functional numeracy measures used in studies of young adults' employability and wages to 180 thirteen-year-olds. The adolescents began the study in kindergarten and participated in multiple assessments of intelligence, working memory, mathematical cognition, achievement, and in-class attentive behavior. Their number system knowledge at the beginning of first grade was defined by measures that assessed knowledge of the systematic relations among Arabic numerals and skill at using this knowledge to solve arithmetic problems. Early number system knowledge predicted functional numeracy more than six years later (ß = 0.195, p = .0014) controlling for intelligence, working memory, in-class attentive behavior, mathematical achievement, demographic and other factors, but skill at using counting procedures to solve arithmetic problems did not. In all, we identified specific beginning of schooling numerical knowledge that contributes to individual differences in adolescents' functional numeracy and demonstrated that performance on mathematical achievement tests underestimates the importance of this early knowledge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 250 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 21%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 61 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 93 36%
Social Sciences 33 13%
Mathematics 17 7%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 75 29%