↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Assessing Species Habitat Using Google Street View: A Case Study of Cliff-Nesting Vultures

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
34 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Assessing Species Habitat Using Google Street View: A Case Study of Cliff-Nesting Vultures
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro P. Olea, Patricia Mateo-Tomás

Abstract

The assessment of a species' habitat is a crucial issue in ecology and conservation. While the collection of habitat data has been boosted by the availability of remote sensing technologies, certain habitat types have yet to be collected through costly, on-ground surveys, limiting study over large areas. Cliffs are ecosystems that provide habitat for a rich biodiversity, especially raptors. Because of their principally vertical structure, however, cliffs are not easy to study by remote sensing technologies, posing a challenge for many researches and managers working with cliff-related biodiversity. We explore the feasibility of Google Street View, a freely available on-line tool, to remotely identify and assess the nesting habitat of two cliff-nesting vultures (the griffon vulture and the globally endangered Egyptian vulture) in northwestern Spain. Two main usefulness of Google Street View to ecologists and conservation biologists were evaluated: i) remotely identifying a species' potential habitat and ii) extracting fine-scale habitat information. Google Street View imagery covered 49% (1,907 km) of the roads of our study area (7,000 km²). The potential visibility covered by on-ground surveys was significantly greater (mean: 97.4%) than that of Google Street View (48.1%). However, incorporating Google Street View to the vulture's habitat survey would save, on average, 36% in time and 49.5% in funds with respect to the on-ground survey only. The ability of Google Street View to identify cliffs (overall accuracy = 100%) outperformed the classification maps derived from digital elevation models (DEMs) (62-95%). Nonetheless, high-performance DEM maps may be useful to compensate Google Street View coverage limitations. Through Google Street View we could examine 66% of the vultures' nesting-cliffs existing in the study area (n = 148): 64% from griffon vultures and 65% from Egyptian vultures. It also allowed us the extraction of fine-scale features of cliffs. This World Wide Web-based methodology may be a useful, complementary tool to remotely map and assess the potential habitat of cliff-dependent biodiversity over large geographic areas, saving survey-related costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 124 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 23 17%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 11 8%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 43%
Environmental Science 28 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 6%
Computer Science 7 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 21 15%