↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Children’s and Adults’ On-Line Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences during Reading

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Children’s and Adults’ On-Line Processing of Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences during Reading
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly S. S. L. Joseph, Simon P. Liversedge

Abstract

While there has been a fair amount of research investigating children's syntactic processing during spoken language comprehension, and a wealth of research examining adults' syntactic processing during reading, as yet very little research has focused on syntactic processing during text reading in children. In two experiments, children and adults read sentences containing a temporary syntactic ambiguity while their eye movements were monitored. In Experiment 1, participants read sentences such as, 'The boy poked the elephant with the long stick/trunk from outside the cage' in which the attachment of a prepositional phrase was manipulated. In Experiment 2, participants read sentences such as, 'I think I'll wear the new skirt I bought tomorrow/yesterday. It's really nice' in which the attachment of an adverbial phrase was manipulated. Results showed that adults and children exhibited similar processing preferences, but that children were delayed relative to adults in their detection of initial syntactic misanalysis. It is concluded that children and adults have the same sentence-parsing mechanism in place, but that it operates with a slightly different time course. In addition, the data support the hypothesis that the visual processing system develops at a different rate than the linguistic processing system in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 37%
Linguistics 14 24%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 17%