↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Mismatch Negativity and Cognitive Performance for the Prediction of Psychosis in Subjects with At-Risk Mental State

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mismatch Negativity and Cognitive Performance for the Prediction of Psychosis in Subjects with At-Risk Mental State
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuko Higuchi, Tomiki Sumiyoshi, Tomonori Seo, Tomohiro Miyanishi, Yasuhiro Kawasaki, Michio Suzuki

Abstract

A shorter duration of untreated psychosis has been associated with better prognosis in schizophrenia. In this study, we measured the duration mismatch negativity (dMMN), an event-related potential, and cognitive performance in subjects with at-risk mental state (ARMS), patients with first-episode or chronic schizophrenia, and healthy volunteers. The main interest was to determine if these neurocognitive measures predict progression to overt schizophrenia in ARMS subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 22%
Neuroscience 22 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 33 22%