↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Morphine Induces Bacterial Translocation in Mice by Compromising Intestinal Barrier Function in a TLR-Dependent Manner

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Morphine Induces Bacterial Translocation in Mice by Compromising Intestinal Barrier Function in a TLR-Dependent Manner
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingjing Meng, Haidong Yu, Jing Ma, Jinghua Wang, Santanu Banerjee, Rick Charboneau, Roderick A. Barke, Sabita Roy

Abstract

Opiates are among the most prescribed drugs for pain management. However, morphine use or abuse results in significant gut bacterial translocation and predisposes patients to serious infections with gut origin. The mechanism underlying this defect is still unknown. In this report, we investigated the mechanisms underlying compromised gut immune function and bacterial translocation following morphine treatment. We demonstrate significant bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph node (MLN) and liver following morphine treatment in wild-type (WT) animals that was dramatically and significantly attenuated in Toll-like receptor (TLR2 and 4) knockout mice. We further observed significant disruption of tight junction protein organization only in the ileum but not in the colon of morphine treated WT animals. Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) blocked the effects of both morphine and TLR ligands, suggesting the role of MLCK in tight junction modulation by TLR. This study conclusively demonstrates that morphine induced gut epithelial barrier dysfunction and subsequent bacteria translocation are mediated by TLR signaling and thus TLRs can be exploited as potential therapeutic targets for alleviating infections and even sepsis in morphine-using or abusing populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 25%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 48 35%