↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Large Should Whales Be?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
How Large Should Whales Be?
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0053967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Clauset

Abstract

The evolution and distribution of species body sizes for terrestrial mammals is well-explained by a macroevolutionary tradeoff between short-term selective advantages and long-term extinction risks from increased species body size, unfolding above the 2 g minimum size induced by thermoregulation in air. Here, we consider whether this same tradeoff, formalized as a constrained convection-reaction-diffusion system, can also explain the sizes of fully aquatic mammals, which have not previously been considered. By replacing the terrestrial minimum with a pelagic one, at roughly 7000 g, the terrestrial mammal tradeoff model accurately predicts, with no tunable parameters, the observed body masses of all extant cetacean species, including the 175,000,000 g Blue Whale. This strong agreement between theory and data suggests that a universal macroevolutionary tradeoff governs body size evolution for all mammals, regardless of their habitat. The dramatic sizes of cetaceans can thus be attributed mainly to the increased convective heat loss is water, which shifts the species size distribution upward and pushes its right tail into ranges inaccessible to terrestrial mammals. Under this macroevolutionary tradeoff, the largest expected species occurs where the rate at which smaller-bodied species move up into large-bodied niches approximately equals the rate at which extinction removes them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
Canada 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 130 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 26%
Researcher 35 23%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Professor 9 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 56%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 8%
Physics and Astronomy 10 7%
Computer Science 9 6%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 13 9%