↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Reward Associations Reduce Behavioral Interference by Changing the Temporal Dynamics of Conflict Processing

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Reward Associations Reduce Behavioral Interference by Changing the Temporal Dynamics of Conflict Processing
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0053894
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth M. Krebs, Carsten N. Boehler, Lawrence G. Appelbaum, Marty G. Woldorff

Abstract

Associating stimuli with the prospect of reward typically facilitates responses to those stimuli due to an enhancement of attentional and cognitive-control processes. Such reward-induced facilitation might be especially helpful when cognitive-control mechanisms are challenged, as when one must overcome interference from irrelevant inputs. Here, we investigated the neural dynamics of reward effects in a color-naming Stroop task by employing event-related potentials (ERPs). We found that behavioral facilitation in potential-reward trials, as compared to no-reward trials, was paralleled by early ERP modulations likely indexing increased attention to the reward-predictive stimulus. Moreover, reward changed the temporal dynamics of conflict-related ERP components, which may be a consequence of an early access to the various stimulus features and their relationships. Finally, although word meanings referring to potential-reward colors were always task-irrelevant, they caused greater interference compared to words referring to no-reward colors, an effect that was accompanied by a relatively early fronto-central ERP modulation. This latter observation suggests that task-irrelevant reward information can undermine goal-directed behavior at an early processing stage, presumably reflecting priming of a goal-incompatible response. Yet, these detrimental effects of incongruent reward-related words were absent in potential-reward trials, apparently due to the prioritized processing of task-relevant reward information. Taken together, the present data demonstrate that reward associations can influence conflict processing by changing the temporal dynamics of stimulus processing and subsequent cognitive-control mechanisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 26%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 50%
Neuroscience 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 36 25%