↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
16 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Why the Long Face? The Mechanics of Mandibular Symphysis Proportions in Crocodiles
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0053873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher W. Walmsley, Peter D. Smits, Michelle R. Quayle, Matthew R. McCurry, Heather S. Richards, Christopher C. Oldfield, Stephen Wroe, Phillip D. Clausen, Colin R. McHenry

Abstract

Crocodilians exhibit a spectrum of rostral shape from long snouted (longirostrine), through to short snouted (brevirostrine) morphologies. The proportional length of the mandibular symphysis correlates consistently with rostral shape, forming as much as 50% of the mandible's length in longirostrine forms, but 10% in brevirostrine crocodilians. Here we analyse the structural consequences of an elongate mandibular symphysis in relation to feeding behaviours.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Argentina 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 148 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 48 29%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 36 22%